22 de abril de 2021

Stemless White Violets in Pennsylvania

Gosh they're confusing. Here's a summary table derived from the master key on Harvey Ballard's website. These are only notes; please cite his website/papers, not this journal entry, which is just a PA-centric re-formatting, including many direct quotations. Again, this is not my work.

Viola odorata can also have white petals sometimes, but it's usually pretty easy to distinguish from this group based on its style shape and large flowers.

Viola... lanceolata primulifolia renifolia minuscula blanda incognita
leaf blades
length vs. width
3 – 8× 1.5 – 2× < 1.2 × < 1.2 × < 1.2 × < 1.2 ×
base cuneate rounded – subcordate deeply cordate shallowly to deeply cordate deeply cordate shallowly, broadly cordate
carriage** lying on substrate
(or widely spreading)
elevated and spreading elevated and spreading elevated and spreading
color bicolorous
(darker green above)
faces uniformly green bicolorous
(darker green above)
(darker green above)
pubescence entirely glabrous
dense on one or both surfaces
strictly glabrous glabrous except for scattered appressed hairs on upper surface glabrous or sparsely to densely hirsute, including petiole
shape broadly ovate or suborbicular to broadly reniform, occasionally suborbicular narrowly to broadly ovate, deltate-ovate, suborbicular or subreniform (very rarely reniform)
apex abruptly apiculate, obtuse or rounded
at least some broader than long
apex obtuse to acute-acuminate
at least some broader than long
apex obtuse to acute-acuminate
margins usually shallowly crenate shallowly crenate low-serrate, teeth noticeable
sinus length < ¼ length of blade > ¼ length of blade
(often > ⅓)
basal lobes touching or overlapping well-separated or divergent
petioles red-tinged or spotted greenish
rhizome vertical, twisted
lacking stolons*
horizontal, stoloniform
producing stolons*
horizontal, stoloniform
producing stolons*
horizontal, stoloniform
producing stolons*
lateral petals beardless (or nearly so) beardless (or nearly so) beardless bearded
cleistogamous capsule
purple-spotted unspotted or with fine red spots red-purple to purple spots/blotches purple spots/blotches
peduncle short and prostrate
arcing upward only when opening
long and erect, often surpassing petioles prostrate, then arcing, sometimes surpassing petioles prostrate, then arcing, much shorter than petioles
length /mm 3.5 – 8 7 – 14
orange-brown – brown
med- dark- olive-brown or brownish-black
fine black spots
light to medium brown
dimensions /mm 1.7 – 2.4 × 1.2 – 1.4 0.8 – 1.4 × 0.7 – 0.8 1.2 – 1.3 × 0.7 – 0.8 1.6 – 2.2 × 1.0 – 1.3
*stolons may be above or below surface of substrate, and may not be apparent until summer. **in life, especially during fruiting

Synonymy with the taxa currently on iNat:
V. minuscula V. blanda V. incognita
V. macloskeyi (in part)
V. pallens (in part?)
V. pallens ssp. pallens
V. pallens ssp. subreptans
V. macloskeyi ssp. pallens
V. blanda (in part)
V. blanda var. blanda
V. blanda (in part)
V. blanda var. palustriformis

Ingresado el 22 de abril de 2021 por ddennism ddennism | 0 comentarios | Deja un comentario

13 de enero de 2020

How many cultivated plants are marked as such on iNaturalist?

Thought I'd try to address this question with a semi-scientific approach:

For the past year (1/12/2020 - 1/12/2019) in a 25 square-mile square centered on Blacksburg, VA:

To the best of my ability to determine, there have been:

131 certainly cultivated, marked wild (plants in orderly rows in flower beds, landscape plantings, hanging baskets, houseplants, exotic trees not known to spread from cultivation, etc.)
90 probably cultivated, marked wild (mostly street trees and commonly cultivated plants that could conceivably be escapes or otherwise wild, but are almost certainly planted, just lacking in enough photo context clues to be certain)
1150 probably wild, marked wild (when in doubt, or totally confused, I chose this category)
131 certainly cultivated, marked cultivated
5 probably wild, marked casual (for some reason other than "captive/cultivated")
2 probably wild, marked cultivated (both were chickory, which were growing as weeds in a lawn)

...so for 1509 tracheophytes in the Blacksburg area:

76%-83% observations were of wild plants;
17%-23% observations were of cultivated plants;

of the cultivated plants:
37% were definitely incorrectly marked as wild;
62% were likely incorrectly marked as wild.
37% were definitely correctly marked as wild.

Ingresado el 13 de enero de 2020 por ddennism ddennism | 4 comentarios | Deja un comentario

08 de octubre de 2019

Goldenrod Galls

Solidago and Euthamia are two plant genera commonly called goldenrods. They host a number of gall-making insects. There isn't a single document online that attempts a complete listing of these insects, to my knowledge.

This journal entry is my attempt to catalog all the gall-making insects on goldenrods. This is probably never going to be an exhaustive list, but I'm striving to include as many as I can find. I'm defining "gall" as a structure primarily composed of plant tissue that is induced by a resident insect and is not otherwise produced. This definition is a little wishy-washy, and could include other stem-borers and leafminers, for example, if one really wants to split hairs, but I have excluded those creatures for now. This is not an identification guide for all insect residents of goldenrod galls. In fact, many times the current resident(s) of a gall are not the original gall-makers! In some galls parasitoids and inquilines are more commonly reared than the initial gall-maker.

This entry was motivated by my observation in summer 2019 that many identifications of Rhopalomyia solidaginis summer galls were probably misidentified on iNaturalist. I think the computer vision was partly to blame for this; it was inaccurately suggesting R. solidaginis as an identification for diverse images. This included identifications on observations of normal rosettes from plants from a variety of families (Asparagaceae to Campanulaceae) with no evidence of an insect or a gall even being present. Users also may have been unaware of the great diversity of gall-midges and other gall-makers on these genera, selecting R. solidaginis by default for any leafy gall on a goldenrod.

That said, many iNaturalist observations of galls on Solidago and Euthamia don't seem to match those of any known species of gall-maker. There may be quite a few out there to be discovered.

Similar Resources

Charley Eiseman has a great series on his blog about goldenrod rosette bud galls:

Beatriz Moisset's bugguide page:

Emily S. Damstra has good illustrations of seven gall-makers on S. altissima:

Much of this information comes from the published work of Netta Dorchin (see full reference list at bottom).

Quick Pictorial Guide to the most frequently-observed galls

Asteromyia euthamiae
photo of Asteromyia euthamiae galls on a Euthamia leaf by Sequoia Sempervirens
photo by Sequoia Sempervirens (@astrobirder)
(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

Asteromyia carbonifera
photo by Matt Parr of Asteromyia carbonifera gall on Solidago leaf
photo by Matt Parr (@ginsengandsoon)
(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

Asphondylia solidaginis
A. solidaginis leaf snap galls photo by Lena Struwe
photo by Lena Struwe (@vilseskog)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

Dasineura folliculata
D. folliculi bud gall
photo by Daniel McClosky (@ddennism)
(CC BY 4.0)

Procecidochares atra
P. atra galls photo
photo by Jason Dombroskie (@jasondombroskie)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

Procecidochares atra
P. atra galls photo
nearly always in Brussels sprouts-like groups along the stem
photo by Yann Kemper (@kemper)

Rhopalomyia capitata
R. capitata bud gall in MN
photo by Miriam Kniaz (@miriamkniaz)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

Rhopalomyia solidaginis
R. solidaginis bud gall
photo by Brad Walker (@edgarallenhoopoe)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
nearly always restricted to the terminal bud - often confused with P. atra galls!

Rhopalomyia pedicellata
close up shot of R. pedicellata gall
photo by Sequoia Sempervirens (@astrobirder)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

Schizomyia racemicola
S. racemicola photo
on S. altissima
photo by Kayleigh Parsons (@saucekay)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

Eurosta solidaginis
E. solidaginis stem gall
photo by Daniel McClosky (@ddennism)
(CC BY 4.0)

Gnorimoschema gallaesolidaginis
photo of Gnorimoschema gallaesolidaginis spindle gall on Solidago stem by Colin D Jones
photo by Colin D Jones (@colindjones)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

Full Guide to Galls

() = uncertainty in the literature about whether this is a host species, or a note that it more rarely/conditionally serves as a host. (()) = host not mentioned in literature, but I suspect there might be some iNat observations of this species serving as a host. bolded = most commonly encountered species

Gall-making insects on Euthamia
("goldentops", "grass-leaved goldenrods")

Euthamia graminifolia photo by joeverica
Euthamia graminifolia photo by iNaturalist user @joeverica (CC BY-NC 4.0)
gall-making insect host type gall description representative images sources
Asphondylia pseudorosa E. graminifolia
((E. caroliniana))
The vegetative bud galls are usually formed at the apex, but can also be found on lateral buds. The outer leaves are broadened, while the innermost leaves form the gall-chamber, which is lined with white mycelium. The innermost leaves eventually turn black. Unlike in R. lobata galls, also found on Euthamia buds, spongy tissue does not form, and each bud gall contains only one larval chamber.

Capitulum bud galls form later in the season. These are difficult to distinguish from normally developing capitula, though they do not flower, instead housing the developing larva. These are also lined with a white mycelium.

Leaf-snap galls are pictured in Dorchin et al. (2015) but not mentioned in the text. They appear to be formed at the terminal bud, and are presumably also lined with fungus.

Felt (1907) raised Camptoneuromyia flavescens, another cecidomyiid, probably from these galls - specifically the flower-head ones. He attributed these galls to "Asphondylia monacha", which is a name he used to refer to what are now known as several distinct Asphondylia species.
photo of A. pseudorosa gall on Euthamia lateral shoot apex by Brad Walker
photo by Brad Walker (@edgarallenhoopoe)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

See also Figs. 15-17 in Dorchin et al. (2015) for other gall locations
Dorchin et al. (2015)
Asteromyia euthamiae Euthamia leaf spot
(stem spot)
Black blisters on leaves (and rarely on stems?). The blisters are lined with white mycelium. There are several generations per year. photo of Asteromyia carbonifera galls on Euthamia leaves by cassi saari
photo by cassi saari (@bouteloua)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

photo of Asteromyia euthamiae galls on a Euthamia leaf bySequoia Sempervirens
photo by Sequoia Sempervirens (@astrobirder)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

photo of Asteromyia euthamiae galls on Euthamia stems by Sequoia Sempervirens
photo by Sequoia Sempervirens (@astrobirder)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
Stireman et al. (2010)
Dasineura carbonaria E. graminifolia bud Shoot tip bud galls, formed by several variously-adherent and contorted leaves. Circular discolored feeding spots are often visible, and these may also contribute bumps and wrinkles to the gall. The gall itself may be green to purple in color. The galls are not sealed; the larvae freely come and go to feed on the leaves, finally exiting to the soil to pupate.

A monogenous species, as is Dasineura folliculi: the offspring of a single female is all of one sex, though multiple oviposition events from multiple mothers can occur on a single host bud, giving rise to mixed-sex composite galls. Because most galls house larvae of a single sex, though, individual galls may be called "male" or "female". I do not know whether male and female galls differ morphologically.

The name "carbonaria" implies a blackened structure, but this is misleading. This midge species has this name because it was mistakenly assigned to the galls made by Asteromyia carbonifera.

D. carbonaria gall on the terminal bud of a Euthamia, photo by Michael K. Oliver
photo by Michael K. Oliver (@cichlidmike)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

D. carbonaria gall on the terminal bud of Euthamia, photo by Jeff Skrentny
photo by Jeff Skrentny (@skrentnyjeff)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

more photos in Dorchin et al. (2007) (paywalled)

Dorchin et al. (2007), Dorchin et al. (2009b)
Epiblema desertana E. graminifolia stem Very narrow stem swellings. Larvae overwinter in the gall.
E. desertana gall on the stem of Euthamia graminifolia
photo by Daniel McClosky (@ddennism)
(CC BY 4.0)
See also Miller (1963) for a reference photo (pg. 67, Fig. 3d)
Miller (1963)
Lasioptera cylindrigallae E. graminifolia stem Very, very narrow stem swellings. Gagné (2017)
Galeopsomyia haemon Asteraceae gall-within-a-gall This hymenopteran induces the plant to produce dark, grayish spherical structures within Asphondylia galls, each of which contains a wasp larva. Dorchin et al. (2015) found these galls most frequently within leaf snap galls, but also found them in A. solidaginis, A. rosulata, and A. pseudorosa bud galls. Beatriz Moisset posted a photo of these galls in A. solidaginis leaf-snap galls here Dorchin et al. (2015)
Rhopalomyia fusiformae E. graminifolia,
E. tenuifolia
variable Same as those of R. pedicellata, but without a pedicel, often lacking even some of the bottom tapering section, appearing as though welded to the host tissue. This minor difference in gall shape correlates with differences in insect morphology. context shot of many R. fusiformae galls
photo by Sequoia Sempervirens (@astrobirder)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
Dorchin et al. (2009)
Rhopalomyia lobata E. graminifolia bud Multi-chambered galls in apical and lateral buds. They start as 1 cm globular swellings within shoot tips or clustered around the shoot tips. Several leaves surround the spongy mass at the gall base, which grows to 6 cm. Eventually the leaves loosen and the whitish tissue reveals 5-35 larval chambers. The leaves continue beyond the gall, thinning towards the apex. R. lobata galls on lateral buds of Euthamia photo by Jason Michael Crockwell
photo by Jason Michael Crockwell (@berkshirenaturalist)
(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

R. lobata galls clustered and fused at the apical buds of Euthamia photo by Christian Grenier
photo by Christian Grenier (@krisskinou)
(CC0 1.0)
Dorchin et al. (2009)
Rhopalomyia pedicellata E. graminifolia variable Pod-like structures attached to stems, leaves, and/or inflorescences. Delicate, slender gall with a single chamber. Green to purplish-red with longitudinal ridges, tapered at both ends. Proximal end has a long, slender stalk ('pedicel') that attaches to the rest of the plant. Two generations per year, at least. close up shot of R. pedicellata gallphoto by Sequoia Sempervirens (@astrobirder)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

context shot of R. pedicellata gallsphoto by Sara Rall (@srall)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
Dorchin et al. (2009)

Gall-making insects on Solidago
(most other "goldenrods")

Solidago altissima photo by ltjeffers
Solidago altissima photo by iNaturalist user @ltjeffers (CC BY-NC 4.0)
gall-making insect host type gall description representative image sources
Asphondylia monacha S. juncea,
S. erecta,
S. uliginosa,
S. altissima
bud-rosette Early Spring Generation (only observed on S. altissima): Bud galls directly off of rhizomes at the soil line: wider and harder than normal buds, single chamber lined with white mycelium. Or, slightly later in the season, bud galls at the tip of longer sprouts, stunting them and making them slightly thickened.

Summer Generation (on S. juncea, S. erecta, S. uliginosa, but NOT S. altissima): Much more conspicuous apical rosette bud galls, lined with mycelium, 15-30 rosette-units, forming a spherical gall complex at the shoot apex. Occasionally found on lateral buds on S. uliginosa, but rarely found there on other host species. S. uliginosa-derived adults were smaller in size as well. The authors speculated that these might represent a separate species (but distinct from the S. uliginosa-galling Asphondylia entity below).
spring generation A. monacha bud gallspring generation

A. monacha bud gall clustersummer generation
photo by Tom Norton (@tsn)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
Dorchin et al. (2015)
Asphondylia rosulata S. rugosa,
(S. gigantea)
leaf snap
Spring-Early Summer: Snap Galls (either hosts): Multiple leaves appear joined together at a blistering point (actually the leaves are "glued" together when the leaves are still developing) to make a single chamber lined with white mycelium. Unlike those produced by A. solidaginis, these galls are often located very near the plant apex, giving rise to a gradient of gall morphology, from leaf snap to bud galls. This gradient is visible in the example observation.

Mid-Late Summer: Bud galls (only on S. rugosa) and only on apical buds. A single, conical chamber in the middle of a rosette of leaves. The chamber is lined with white mycelium. These galls are smaller and flatter than those formed by R. solidaginis on S. rugosa, and are composed of fewer leaves. Unlike those of R. solidaginis, these galls contain a single chamber.
See Fig. 11-14 in Dorchin et al. (2015) for images of leaf snap and terminal bud galls by this species.

An observation of a gradient of A. rosulata galls, from leaf-snap galls to a bud gall, on Solidago rugosa by Ashley M Bradfordbud gall and leaf-snap galls on Solidago in subsect. Venosae in TN.
photo by Ashley M Bradford (@ashley_bradford)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

Photo of A. rosulata leaf-snap gall on Solidago rugosa, Daniel McCloskyleaf-snap gall on S. rugosa in PA.
photo by Daniel McClosky (@ddennism)
(CC BY 4.0)
Dorchin et al. (2015)
Asphondylia silva S. caesia bud Very small, single-chambered bud galls at shoot tips. Several very short leaves press together to form a single, mycelium-lined chamber. photo of a A. silva gall on Solidago caesia, Daniel McCloskygall on S. caesia in PA.
photo by Daniel McClosky (@ddennism)
(CC BY 4.0)
Dorchin et al. (2015)
Asphondylia solidaginis S. altissima,
(S. gigantea)
leaf snap
Spring-Early Summer: Leaf-Snap Galls (either host): Multiple leaves appear joined together at a blistering point (actually the leaves are "glued" together while the leaves are developing) to make a single chamber lined with white mycelium.

Mid-Late Summer: Bud galls (only on S. altissima) on apical and/or axillary buds (3-5 cm in diameter), with a single, conical chamber in the middle that is lined with white mycelium. Unlike in Rhopalomyia solidaginis galls, the central chamber is not obscured by the surrounding modified leaves; it is visible without dissection. The gall walls are lined with thick white mycelia. The surrounding rosette of bunched leaves is also smaller in size, and flatter (not tufted). R. solidaginis bud galls usually contain several chambers per gall; those of A. solidaginis contain a single chamber. Another cecidomyiid fly: Camptoneuromyia adhesa sometimes emerges from snap-galls like these.
A. solidaginis leaf snap galls photo by Lena Struweleaf snap galls
photo by Lena Struwe (@vilseskog )
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

A. solidaginis bud gall photo by Timothy Freybud gall
photo by Timothy Frey (@calconey)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
Dorchin et al. (2015)
Felt (1907)
Asphondylia sp.1 (S. bicolor galler) S. bicolor bud-rosette A. monacha-like galls (and insects) that are distinct from A. monacha according to a molecular phylogenetic analysis. Could be the same species as A. sp. "S. sempervirens galler". One insect from a S. uliginosa rosette gall also sorted into this clade, while others from that host species sorted into A. monacha. S. bicolor galler gall imagegall on S. bicolor

See also Fig. 6 in Dorchin et al. (2015).
Dorchin et al. (2015)
Asphondylia sp.1 (S. sempervirens galler) S. sempervirens bud-rosette A. monacha-like galls (and insects) that are distinct from A. monacha according to a molecular phylogenetic analysis. Could be the same species as A. sp. "S. bicolor galler". One S. uliginosa rosette gall adult also sorted into this clade, while others sorted into A. monacha. Unlike A. monacha, this species also makes lateral bud galls. See Charley Eiseman's (@ceiseman) blog post for a photo by Noah Charney of this gall, along with details of its discovery and insects reared from it.

See also Fig. 5 in Dorchin et al. (2015) for a photo of these terminal bud galls.
Dorchin et al. (2015)
Asphondylia sp.1 (S. uliginosa galler) S. uliginosa bud-rosette See comments for A. "S. sempervirens galler" and A. "S. bicolor galler". Distinct, at least, from A. monacha, though that species also forms rosette bud galls on S. uliginosa. Dorchin et al. (2015)
Asphondylia sp.2 S. nemoralis leaf snap Leaf snap galls similar to those made by Asphondylia species are observed rarely on this species, but the insect responsible is unknown Dorchin et al. (2015)
Asphondylia sp.2 S. tortifolia° bud-rosette A. rosulata-like galls have been observed in October, but the insect responsible is unknown Dorchin et al. (2015)
Asphondylia sp.2 S. patula bud-rosette Aggregated bud galls with mini-rosettes, like those made by A. monacha, have been observed on this species, but the insect remains unknown. Could be A. monacha, or another gall-maker.

My note: These observations [here and here] of bud galls on S. patula may be the same galls referred to by Dorchin et al. (2015).
A. patula aggregated bud gallsaggregated bud galls atop S. patula
photo by Daniel McClosky (@ddennism)
(CC BY 4.0)
Dorchin et al. (2015)
Asphondylia sp.2 S. odora bud-rosette Aggregated bud galls like those made by A. monacha have been observed on this species, but the insect remains unknown. Could be A. monacha, or another insect.

My note: Alvin Diamond (@adiamond) has observed galls in Alabama on S. odora that resemble R. solidaginis bud galls on S. altissima. These may or may not be the same S. odora galls Dorchin et al. (2015) refer to.
Dorchin et al. (2015), this iNat observation
Asteralobia solidaginis S. pacifica east Asia

renamed Schizomyia solidaginis in Elsayed et al. (2018)
Gagné (2017)
Elsayed et al. (2018)
Asteromyia carbonifera Solidago leaf spot Black blisters on leaves, lined internally with white mycelium. Interesting evolutionary biology research has been done in this system, particularly in the lab of John Stireman at Wright State University. Different lineages of A. carbonifera induce differently-shaped galls. The fungus that lines the interior of these galls is Botryosphaeria dothidea. photo by Matt Parr of Asteromyia carbonifera gall on Solidago leaf
photo by Matt Parr (@ginsengandsoon)
(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

photo of Asteromyia carbonifera gall on Solidago leaf by Sequoia Sempervirens
photo by Sequoia Sempervirens (@astrobirder)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

photo of Asteromyia carbonifera galls on Solidago leaf by Chuck Sexton
photo by Chuck Sexton (@gcwarbler)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
Stireman et al. (2010)
Asteromyia modesta Solidago,
leaf spot Leaf blisters. "Galls" might be an overstatement; the larvae reside in cryptic pockets of leaf tissue that may be purple but are often nearly the same green color as the surrounding leaf tissue. The chambers are lined with a thin mycelium layer.

Probably polyphyletic as currently circumscribed, with two distinct clades, one of which is itself polyphyletic with the recognition of A. tumifica. Both clades include some individuals sampled from galls on Solidago.
Charley Eiseman (@ceiseman) accidentally reared this midge from a leaf with more prominent leaf-mines, and photographed both the blister and the midge. Stireman et al. (2010)
Bug Tracks post
Asteromyia tumifica Solidago stem Spongy outgrowth that partially or wholly encircles a stem. Can be very low on stem.

Nested within one of two A. modesta clades, rendering that clade paraphyletic, so perhaps this insect taxon will be folded into a revised concept of A. modesta in the future.
Photo by John van der Linden, identified by Raymond Gagné Stireman et al. (2010)
Dasineura folliculi S. rugosa,
S. gigantea,
((S. altissima)),
((S. canadensis))
bud-rosette Shoot tip bud galls that resemble other bud galls, but are looser and show evidence of feeding (yellowish spots, sometimes deforming the leaves somewhat) on the more-distal portions of the gall leaves. The larvae exit the galls to pupate in the soil. Dasineura larvae are orange. Similar, but smaller and white-colored larvae may be Macrolabis americana, an inquiline.

A monogenous species, as is Dasineura carbonaria: the offspring of a single female is all of one sex, though multiple oviposition events from multiple mothers can occur on a single host bud, giving rise to mixed-sex composite galls. Because most galls house larvae of a single sex, though, individual galls may be called "male" or "female". I do not know whether male and female galls differ morphologically.
D. folliculi bud gall on S. rugosa in central PA Dorchin et al. (2006)
Dorchin et al. (2007), Dorchin et al. (2009b)
Dasineura virgaureae S. virgaurea variable? Eurasia. There are several descriptions of the galls caused by this midge. Galls in shoot tips, capitula, leaf rolls, and swollen flower buds have all been ascribed to this fly. Gagné (2017)
Dorchin et al. (2006)
Epiblema scudderiana S. altissima, Solidago spp.
Heterotheca subaxillaris
stem Narrowly cylindrical-ellipsoid stem-swelling galls. Sometimes irregularly shaped. Two holes. One small one near the top and close to a leaf axil. This is the entry hole. Another hole gets larger through the season. This is the frass-ejection and eventual exit hole. This "bung hole" is blocked with caterpillar-derived material that fits the hole closely and resembles a train wheel. Univoltine; larvae overwinter in the gall. Before winter, the caterpillar spins a silk funnel that guides the emerging moth to the exit hole. Branches often proliferate at or above the gall. But see also Lasioptera galls. photo by David of Epiblema scudderiana gall on Solidago stemphoto by David (@davidenrique)
(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Miller (1963),
Miller (1976),
Brown et al. (1983)
Eurosta comma (S. juncea,
S. missouriensis,
S. rugosa)
rhizome Swellings on rhizomes very near soil line. Sometimes peanut-like in outline. Steyskal & Foote (1977) give a reasonable rationale for explaining that earlier authors have confused the host-species for E. elsa and E. comma; they attempt to correct the record by assigning E. elsa to S. juncea and E. comma to S. rugosa. Modern databases (according to ITIS) synonymize E. elsa with E. comma. photos and illustrations in Novak & Foote (1980) (paywalled)
Eurosta comma gall on Solidago juncea rhizome by Daniel McClosky
(CC BY 4.0)
bugguide, Cedar Creek (2000), Novak & Foote (1980)
Eurosta cribrata S. juncea,
S. sempervirens
rhizome "Crown Gall" that begins basically at the soil line (or just under), but grows upwards and is mostly above-ground at maturity. Like those of E. comma, the galls resemble peanuts somewhat. Ming (1989) includes E. conspurcata and E. reticulata in synonymy with this species. My note: Are S. juncea and S. sempervirens really hosting the same fly species? photos and illustrations in Novak & Foote (1980) (paywalled) bugguide, Arthr. Fl., Sutton & Steck (2005)
Eurosta fenestra ? rhizome Sutton & Steck (2005) say that this is also a member of the E. comma species complex. They mention that it's probably never actually been found in FL, despite earlier reports, which were due to misidentifications of E. floridensis or other members of the E. comma species complex. photos and illustrations in Novak & Foote (1980) (paywalled) Sutton & Steck (2005)
Eurosta floridensis S. fistulosa rhizome Galls are similar to those made by E. comma and E. fenestra. Arth. Fl., Sutton & Steck (2005)
Eurosta lateralis S. chapmanii stem Similar to galls made by E. solidaginis, but the gall radius is much smaller (Foster, 1934, as "E. nicholsoni", later realized to be synonymous with E. lateralis by Foote (1964)). Another synonym: E. donysa. Only known from Brevard Co., FL, at least recently. Sutton & Steck (2005) state that it may be critically endangered. They give S. odora as the host, but that was before S. chapmanii was segregated from that species. They point out a very old record by Wiedemann (1830) also possibly of this species in the "Indien" (sic) River area of Florida. Foster (1934) points to galls found "near Titusville", "near Malabar", and "from 5.5 miles southwest of Indian River" all near the coast. Arth. Fl., Sutton & Steck (2005)
Eurosta solidaginis S. altissima,
S. gigantea,
(S. canadensis),
(S. rugosa)
stem Round, nearly spherical stem galls. Exterior vestiture depends on host species; hairy in S. altissima (presumably also hairy in S. canadensis and S. rugosa), smooth and shiny in S. gigantea. There is a great wealth of literature on the evolutionary dynamics of this system. Gall diameter seems to be under the control of the insect's genetics, not the host plant's. Insects that produce galls with larger diameters are more likely to survive attack by parasitic wasps, whose ovipositors are unable to penetrate the thicker galls. However, larger galls are more attractive to bird predators. There is also interesting research on host-species specialization by different populations of this fly (on S. altissima vs. on S. gigantea), and the divergent selection at play during this process. The galls are so frequent on S. altissima in the mid-Atlantic, that the presence of galls has been suggested as a character for distinguishing S. altissima plants from S. canadensis, although S. canadensis can also be (rarely?) a host for this fly. E. solidaginis stem gallon S. altissima

E. solidaginis stem gall by Daniel Georgeon S. gigantea
photo by Daniel George (@danielgeorge)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
Bucknell University Solidago Gall Website, Moffatt et al. (2019), Stoltzfus (1989)
Eutreta hespera Solidago sp. rhizome Reared once from rhizomes of an unknown Solidago species near Custer, SD, but the flies have been collected from the Dakotas westward, through much of western NA. Stoltzfus (1974)
Eutreta noveboracensis S. altissima,
(S. rugosa),
(Solidago spp.)
rhizome Larvae bore through rhizomes and above-ground stems, inducing galls. The stem-borers emerge earlier than the rhizome-borers (and are bivoltine rather than univoltine), so these two groups might represent cryptic sister species. Stem-galls can be found near the ground, sometimes described as crown galls. "Eutreta sparsa" is sometimes attributed to these and other galls on North American Astereae, but this is actually a South American species that probably does not make galls on Solidago, instead associating with Stachytarpheta branches. bugguide, Stoltzfus (1974)
Galeopsomyia haemon Asteraceae gall-within-a-gall See entry in Euthamia table above.
Gnorimoschema gallaeasteriella S. flexicaulis
(S. caesia),
Eurybia divaricata,
Doellingeria umbellata,
probably others
stem Stem galls similar to those of G. gallaesolidaginis, but with brown bung holes (? - implied in Miller (1963)). Need to find a print copy of Miller (2000) to read more about this genus. Judd (1962) could not find any galls on S. caesia despite there being large numbers of these plants adjacent to and within the S. flexicaulis site with many galls. I think it's likely that the initial report of galls from S. caesia may be in error since these two Solidago species were frequently confused/lumped early on. Then again, the Eurybia and Doellingeria host reports suggest a wider range of acceptable hosts. Busck (1911) considered this problem of host identification, and concluded that the species may simply have a wide host range. [his S. latifolia is our S. flexicaulis; his Aster corymbosus apparently refers to E. divaricata]. woodcut of gall by D. S. Kellicott (1878)
woodcut of gall by D. S. Kellicott (1878)
Nazari & Landry (2012)
Judd (1962)
Kellicott (1878)
Gnorimoschema gallaesolidaginis S. altissima,
S. canadensis
stem Ellipsoid (wider than those of Epiblema) stem galls with a characteristic white exit bung-hole. Miller (1963) mentions that there are other species in this genus that make galls on other Solidago species. His monograph on them (2000) lists eight species, most of which are on Solidago. Later, Heard & Kitts (2012) compared G. gallaesolidaginis on S. altissima and S. gigantea. Nason et al. (2002) considered this to either contain a single differentiating species (into semispecies) onto the two respective host-groups (S. altissima / canadensis and S. gigantea), or two barely-isolated cryptic species, in which case see G. jocelynae for more. Need to find a print copy of Miller (2000) to read more about this genus. photo of Gnorimoschema gallaesolidaginis spindle gall on Solidago stem by Colin D Jones
photo by Colin D Jones (@colindjones)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
Miller (1963),
Heard & Kitts (2012),
Nazari & Landry (2012)
Gnorimoschema gallaespeciosum (S. speciosa)
(S. jejunifolia)
(S. rigidiuscula)
stem? Mentioned in passing in Nazari & Landry (2012). Need to find a print copy of Miller (2000) to read more about this genus. Type specimen is from Ramsey Co., MN, which is out-of-range for S. speciosa in the new, strict sense. The host is probably S. jejunifolia and/or S. rigidiuscula. This gall has the bung-hole located just above the middle of the gall - unlike its relatives. Nazari & Landry (2012)
Gnorimoschema gibsoniella S. rigida,
(Symphyotrichum pilosum)
stem S. rigida reported as the host plant for the type collection. Nazari & Landry (2012) cite Miller (2000) for additional host. Need to find a print copy of Miller (2000) to read more about this genus. Initial description by Busck here. Nazari & Landry (2012)
Gnorimoschema jocelynae S. gigantea stem This is the name Miller (2000) gave to the host-race derived from G. gallaesolidaginis, when that species established a cryptic sister species on S. gigantea (Nason et al. 2002). The only difference is in the bung hole coloration - which was determined by the adult's ancestral host species, not its current host species in Miller (2000), however, Nason et al. (2002) points out that these exit hole characteristics could be idiosyncratic to particular plants and Miller's N was only 3 for this experiment. Need to find a print copy of Miller (2000) to read more about this genus. Works after Nason et al. (2002) tend to refer to these moths as G. gallaesolidaginis, gigantea host-race. Nazari & Landry (2012)
Gnorimoschema salinaris S. sempervirens,
S. missouriensis
S. juncea
other members in this species group
stem S. gigantea is also a host according to one MI record in Nazari & Landry (2012), but this might be G. gallaesolidaginis/G. jocelynae. The original description, by Busck, noted that the insects were reared from galls similar to those of Gnorimoschema gallaesolidaginis, but on Solidago sempervirens. Need to find a print copy of Miller (2000) to read more about this genus. Nazari & Landry (2012)
Janetiella inquilina Solidago sp. ? aka Oligotrophus inquilinus Felt 1908; on "S. canadensis" which, at the time, could have referred to several species in subsection Triplinerviae. Gagné (2017)
Lasioptera solidaginis Solidago stem Irregular, elongate stem-swelling galls. Makes a small exit hole on the side of the gall. But see also Epliblema galls. bugguide
Lestodiplosis carolinae S. canadensis (presum. sensu lato) bud-rosette maybe this is a synonym of R. carolina(e), itself a synonym of R. solidaginis?

Asheville, NC
Gagné (2017)
Lestodiplosis rugosae Solidago sp. New York Gagné (2017)
Lestodiplosis triangularis Solidago sp. leaf New York Gagné 2017
Procecidochares anthracina S. californica bud bud galls cluster on stem near where the stem emerges from rhizomes. Usually buried in humus, but not truly subterranean. Univoltine, unlike P. atra. Reported from "S. velutina" in California - these plants are now in the segregate species, S. californica, according to John Semple's website. Goeden & Teerink (1997)
Procecidochares atra S. altissima,
S. gigantea,
S. rugosa,
S. nemoralis
(Erigeron canadensis),
(Aster°° sp.)
bud Spring Generation: Large stem galls at the base of the host plant, each containing several larvae.

Summer Generation: Lateral bud galls that look like Brussels sprouts initially, and eventually open as the fly matures. The terminal bud is also sometimes galled, but usually in addition to lateral galls. (My observation: When the terminal bud is galled, it is often much larger than the accompanying lateral galls.) The gall chamber is large and not sealed, much larger than the fly larva or pupa, and is slightly open at the distal end. The chamber has the appearance of being inset into the stem somewhat, although the surrounding tissue may not technically be derived from the stem, but rather from other plant tissues. At maturity, the rosette of leaves surrounding the gall typically flatten and grow away from the gall, giving the gall a more rosette-like appearance.

(My note: At this stage, these galls, particularly the terminal ones, can superficially resemble those of Rhopalomyia solidaginis and Asphondylia solidaginis. However, those midge-induced galls have distinct chambers formed by one or few young leaves. The midge gall chambers are cryptic, translucent conical structures set atop the host stem rather than appearing hollowed-out within stem-like tissue.) Each gall has only one larva, unlike in the spring generation.

This species probably has many other hosts, including some outside Solidago, although some researchers have speculated that there may be cryptic host-races within P. atra, some of which may have fully speciated (Philips & Smith 1998).
P. atra galls photo
photo by Jason Dombroskie (@jasondombroskie)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
P. atra galls photo
photo by Yann Kemper (@kemper)

P. atra bud gall vertical section
summer generation, vertical section through terminal bud gall
wikipedia, iNat obs, bugguide, Philips and Smith (1998), Aldrich (1929) for S. nemoralis record
Procecidochares minuta (Solidago)
stem Recorded from a stem gall on Solidago californica in Wasbauer (1972): "C. D. A. 1 In stem gall; CALIFORNIA: Palomar Mt., San Diego Co., IX-19-1964, E. D. Algert". This species is known to produce galls on a number of composite host species, including rabbitbrushes. I'm not sure this record is from a correctly identified host plant; rabbitbrushes can look vaguely like goldenrods before blooming. Wasbauer (1972)
Procecidochares polita (S. virgata),
(S. chrysopsis),
(((S. sempervirens))),
(((S. mexicana)))
?? Reared from Solidago sp. "small, roundish galls" by Girault (1913) in VA. Reported from galls of Solidago sp. by Johnson (1910). However, Aldrich (1929) says that accounts of this species being reared from Solidago galls are in error, and actually refer to P. atra due to some nomenclatural confusion at the time in the literature.

Much later, Ibrahim (1980) attributes "Solidago stricta" stem galls collected in Dade County, FL to P. polita. At that time, "Solidago stricta" would have referred to what is now known as S. virgata or possibly S. chrysopsis at that location (see John Semple's website for details). There are older records for collections in the Jacksonville, FL area (Sutton & Steck 2005) and Falls Church, VA area (Aldrich 1929). Sutton & Steck (2005) caution that many details in Ibrahim (1980) are inaccurate and repeat known mistakes from earlier literature, though they don't mention the P. polita record specifically.

The adult flies are apparently easily distinguished from P. atra by having entirely yellow legs rather than having black femora and coxae. Goeden & Norrbom (2001) say it's distributed along the east coast, from MA to FL. None of these post-1929 sources describe the gall.

This fly seems to be restricted to the east coast of the USA, so its host plant, if it is a Solidago species, is probably a coastal species. It could be all or some members of the S. sempervirens-S. mexicana complex, which are in the same subsection as S. virgata and S. chrysopsis. Wasbauer (1972) includes some records from "S. stricta" galls as well.
Aldrich (1929), Ibrahim (1980), Goeden & Norrbom (2001), Sutton & Steck (2005)
Rhopalomyia anthophila S. altissima capitulum Capitulum (flower-head) galls among the inflorescence of the host. Cylindrical, or like a truncated cone. Fuzzy and whitish. Inner chamber conical, resembling the shape of other Rhopalomyia insect chambers, with thin walls. photo of an isolated R. anthophila gall
photo by Kevin Keegan (@kevinliam)
(public domain)

context shot of many R. anthophila galls
among S. altissima capitula

macro image of R. anthophila galls by Dan Mullen
photo by Dan Mullen
(CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
Dorchin et al. (2009)
Rhopalomyia bulbula S. juncea bud Only a spring generation is known, but the insect is presumably multivoltine;
Spring Generation: "Clustered on rhizomes, at the bases of spring shoots. The gall resembles a bud, with acute apex and base. Surface is smooth and white, with green stripes where exposed to light." Single chambered.
photograph of R. bulbula gall from Felt (1917)
Photo from Felt (1917)
Dorchin et al. (2009)
Rhopalomyia capitata S. gigantea,
S. leavenworthii,
(S. altissima),
((S. canadensis))
bud Spring Generation: Few (1-8) conical chambers surrounded by disorganized small leaves, sheathed (initially at least, sometimes loosening) by several wide leaves. Distinctly more conspicuous than R. solidaginis spring galls.

Summer Generation: Apical bud gall with many small leaves of uniform length in the middle, surrounding many (6-20) closed larval chambers. Wide leaves also sheath these galls. The uniformly-small leaves give the overall gall complex a flat-topped appearance. Whereas tufts of leaves that comprise the summer generation gall complex formed by R. solidaginis form discernible mini-rosettes, each surrounding a larval chamber, in R. capitata the gall leaves are not obviously so-organized, perhaps as a consequence of there being many more chambers.

My side note: In the upper Great Lakes region there are leafy galls on S. gigantea that more closely resemble those made by R. solidaginis.
R. capitata spring bud gall
spring generation

R. capitata bud gallsummer generation

R. capitata bud gall, vertical sectionsummer generation bud gall, vertically sectioned
photo by hallm (@hallm)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

R. capitata bud gall in MNsummer generation bud gall, from above, in MN
photo by Miriam Kniaz (@miriamkniaz)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
Dorchin et al. (2009)
Rhopalomyia clarkei S. rugosa,
S. altissima
leaf out-growth
stem out-growth
Small, conical, single-chambered. Usually on abaxial leaf surface, but can also appear on adaxial surface or on stems. When on leaves, attached at a major vein. Green to yellow-green and covered with hairs. Very young galls with a tuft of hair at base. Multivoltine. Less frequent on S. altissima.

(My observation: There are several gall observations on iNaturalist that fit this description, and are currently identified as R. clarkei, but they do not all closely resemble one another. They may represent different stages of development, or else different presentations on different host species.)
See Figs. 62-65 of Dorchin et al. (2009) for additional images of these galls at various stages of development on S. rugosa and S. altissima.

R. clarkei leaf gall photo by Will Van Hemessen
photo by Will Van Hemessen (@wdvanhem)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

R. clarkei leaf gall photo by Sara Scharf
photo by Sara Scharf (@scharf)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
Dorchin et al. (2009)
Rhopalomyia cruziana (S. spathulata),
(S. velutina)
capitulum? From an unknown gall from an unidentified Solidago species growing in the Santa Cruz mountains in California. The species to the left are my speculation based on the Solidago native to this region. Dorchin (2009) infers that the gall is probably a capitulum gall because the adult insects closely resemble other capitulum-gallers in this genus. Dorchin et al. (2009)
Rhopalomyia gina S. juncea leaf outgrowth Like R. clarkei galls, but usually on upper side of leaf and with a corresponding scar or little tail on the opposite side. Hairless, probably reflecting the vestiture of the host plant. See Figs. 68-69 in Dorchin et al. (2009) for images.
My note: Fig. 69 shows a leaf with what might be pubescence on the abaxial surface (in addition to the normal cilia at the leaf margin), which makes me wonder whether this is really S. juncea.
Dorchin et al. (2009)
Rhopalomyia guttata S. bicolor capitulum Hidden among normal-looking inflorescence pedicels of neighboring capitula. Galls are conical-cylindrical, droplet-shaped, smooth, white-to-green or sometimes red. Tapering apically. Galled capitula are wider and harder to the touch than ungalled ones. Unlike R. anthophila galls, these retain the capitulum's pedicel. Dorchin et al. (2009)
Rhopalomyia hirtipes S. juncea bud Forms fleshy bud galls at the shoot apex, often arresting shoot growth while the plant is still very short. Gall initially has a tapered tip, but this disappears with growth. The whole gall eventually becomes ovoid and reminiscent of a potato. Spongy and usually multi-chambered. See also R. thompsoni for a similar gall that appears earlier in the season and mostly underground. R. hirtipes bud gall photo by catherineklatt
photo by Catherine Klatt (@catherineklatt)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

R. hirtipes bud gall photo by Charles and Kathy Appell showing the plant flowering from lateral buds under the gall.
not always arresting growth
photo by Charles and Kathy Appell (@charleshappell)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
Dorchin et al. (2009)
Rhopalomyia inquisitor S. gigantea leaf outgrowth? Originally described as an inquiline in R. capitata galls, but this could not be replicated by Dorchin et al. (2009). The did notice R. clarkei-like galls (except smooth-surfaced) on S. gigantea, though, particularly on leaves from within Dasineura follicularis galls. Conjecture that these R. clarkei-like galls might be the real galls occupied by this species. Perhaps Felt (the original describer) confused D. follicularis galls with R. capitata galls, and then concluded that R. inquisitor was an "inquilines" that way? However, Dorchin et al. (2009) were unable to rear any adults from these R. clarkei-like galls on S. gigantea, so the galls where R. inquisitor resides remain unclear. An example of these galls is probably shown here: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/744023 by Sara Rall (@srall). R. inquisitor galls, maybe, on S. gigantea leaves
click to zoom to see small leaf-outgrowths. Leaf clustering may be caused by D. follicularis. Host plant is S. gigantea.
photo by Sara Rall (@srall)
(CC BY-NC 4.0)

See Figs. 66-67 in Dorchin et al. (2009) for reference images.
Dorchin et al. (2009)
Rhopalomyia racemicola S. altissima,
(S. fistulosa)
capitulum Green, bristly, onion-shaped capitulum galls, sometimes found in aggregations. Galls on S. fistulosa were tentatively identified as this species by Raymond Gagné . The illustration in Felt (1915) by L. H. Joutel looks suspiciously like Schizomyia racemicola, but I can find no other published images of these galls. Illustration of galls of Rhopalomyia racemicola on an unidentified Solidago by L. H. Joutel in Felt's 1913(1915) 29th Report of the State Entolomogist
Illustration by L. H. Joutel in Felt (1915)
Dorchin et al. (2009), Felt (1915)
Rhopalomyia solidaginis S. altissima,
S. canadensis,
S. rugosa,
((S. odora))
bud-rosette Spring Generation: Inconspicuous, shoot tip rosette bud-galls, often stunting the shoot. Unlike the later generation, these typically enclose a single, white, conical gall-chamber, but sometimes several gall-chambers are connected longitudinally.

Summer generation: Each of multiple (2-5) chambers is surrounded by a group of very short and narrow leaves, which are in turn surrounded by longer and wider leaves to form a distinct rosette-subunit within the gall complex. The whole complex itself forms a conspicuous mass of leaves. This is a very common gall in the mid-Atlantic states.

Alvin Diamond (@adiamond) has observed similar galls on S. odora in Alabama; I'm not sure whether these are the galls that Dorchin (2015) refers to and suspects an Asphondylia midge of making (see Asphondylia entries above) or if this is a distinct entity.
See Figs. 70, 72 in Dorchin et al. (2009) for images of spring generation galls. R. solidaginis bud gall vertical sectionsummer generation

R. solidaginis bud gall vertical sectionsummer generation, vertical section
Dorchin et al. (2009)
Rhopalomyia thompsoni S. altissima
(S. juncea)
(S. rugosa)
rhizome bud Spring Generation: Solitary or clustered, bulbous, fleshy masses with 1-8 chambers each. Start on rhizomes (underground) but become apparent above ground by emergence time in early May.

Second Generation: Brownish, globular multi-chambered swellings of the rhizomes that stay underground until late September when they become apparent above the soil surface for adult emergence. Both galls and adults resemble R. hirtipes Dorchin et al (2009) could only find galls that reared adults similar to the type of R. thompsoni from galls from S. atissima, but Felt had listed the other two species as hosts.
Dorchin et al. (2009)
Rhopalomyia sp. (S. fistulosa-stem-galler) S. fistulosa stem Aggregated stem galls, each gall a hairy grayish oval, with a single chamber each. The whole aggregate commonly has a star-like structure. They appear most similar to R. racemicola galls. Might be responsible for the gall in this observation: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/31507758 Dorchin et al. (2009)
Schizomyia racemicola Solidago capitulum Greenish-purplish onion-shaped capitulum galls alongside normal capitula in the inflorescence. Gall exterior is smooth. Gall-maker larva is bright red-orange. It exits the gall as a larva and pupates elsewhere. S. racemicola gall on S. ulmifoliaon S. ulmifolia
S. racemicola gall on S. altissimaon S. altissima
Schizomyia solidaginis Solidago pacifica See Asteralobia solidaginis entry.
Tephritis webbi Solidago sp. capitulum "M. F. Canova states that the specimen was taken from a gall in the flowerhead of goldenrod." Sycan Glen, OR. The adult insects closely resemble T. michiganiensis and T. pura, neither of which have known host species (at least by 1951). Quisenberry (1951)

Some records of Trupanea spp. infesting goldenrod flower-heads, but do they form galls?

Wasbauer (1973) gives a secondary record for galls of Aciurina bigeloviae on Solidago, but this species probably doesn't regularly gall Solidago (?)

Foote & Blanc (1963) ascribe a collection of galls on Solidago in Inyo Co., CA to A. ferruginea, but this fly typically galls rabbit-brushes. Maybe a mistaken host ID?

See also Aster Yellows phytoplasma, which can induce phyllody in Solidago.

°observed in Maryland (??)
°°I think this Conyza species is probably C. canadensis, which is back in Erigeron now.
°°°probably refers to Symphyotrichum species now, not Aster sensu lato.

1These entries are for insects that induced galls that resembled those of A. monacha, but were found on other host Solidago species, and were divergent phylogenetically.
2These entries are for the un-studied (to my knowledge) insects that induce Asphondylia-like galls on other host Solidago species. These are known only from the appearance of galls on these goldenrods; the midges themselves have been neither reared nor described. These entries may represent infestation by known Asphondylia midges, A. monacha and A. solidaginis in particular, on occasional/accidental host species. I myself have observed Asphondylia-like galls on S. patula. They may also represent unrelated gall-making organisms.

Unexpected / Interesting goldenrod gall observations

Rhopalomyia solidaginis-like bud gall on Solidago chapmanii: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/37226412

Asphondylia monacha-like bud gall on Solidago leavenworthii:

bud-gall on Solidago sp. (?) in Kansas:

Asphondylia monacha-like bud galls on Solidago sempervirens:
(probably the same bud-galler discovered by Charley Eiseman here:
and in the above table as: "Asphondylia sp. (S. sempervirens-galler)"

bud-gall on Solidago juncea (?):

tiny bud-galls on Solidago ulmifolia (?) in IL:

Asphondylia-like bud galls on southeastern USA Solidago sp., possibly A. monacha on S. erecta:

Asphondylia monacha-like bud gall cluster on Solidago sp. in VA:

Asphondylia monacha-like bud gall cluster on Solidago altissima (?) in NJ:
...or very, very large R. solidaginis galls, I guess. More-typical looking examples of R. solidaginis in immediate vicinity: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/34507741
Could also be R. capitata but on an atypical host species (host is definitely not S. gigantea), and the gall is not flat-topped.
A similar situation in N IL:

Asphondylia solidaginis-like leaf deformities (and maybe a snap-gall?) on Solidago sp. in MS:

A very tightly-wound Asphondylia solidaginis-like gall:

Is this Asphondylia rosulata on Solidago rugosa?

not Procecidochares atra, looks kind of like Dasineura, but lateral galls present in addition to terminal gall, on S. altissima in OH:

Dasineura-like leaf deformities in spring in TX:

A strange bud gall on Solidago in CT:

A bud gall on Solidago way out-of-range in Washington State:

Rhopalomyia anthophila-like gall chamber, but not on the inflorescence, in MI:

Rhopalomyia solidaginis-like bud galls in appearance, but on S. gigantea in MN:
and in MA:

Asphondylia-like bud galls on S. rigida (?) in IL:

Asphondylia-like bud galls on S. buckleyi (?) in IL:

bud gall on Solidago ptarmicoides in Ontario:

Rhopalomyia capitata on a Solidago species that is not S. gigantea:


Aldrich (1929):

Arth. Fl. = Arthropods of Florida website by Florida State Museum of Entomology:

Bucknell University Eurosta biology page:

Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve (2000):

Dorchin et al. (2006):
Dorchin, N., Scott, E. R., Abrahamson, W. G. (2006) First Record of Macrolabis (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in America: A new inquiline species from Dasineura folliculi galls on goldenrods. Systematics 99(4): 656-661.

Dorchin et al. (2007):
Netta Dorchin, Carolyn E. Clarkin, Eric R. Scott, Michael P. Luongo, Warren G. Abrahamson, Taxonomy, Life History, and Population Sex Ratios of North American Dasineura (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on Goldenrods (Asteraceae), Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Volume 100, Issue 4, 1 July 2007, Pages 539–548, https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2007)100[539:TLHAPS]2.0.CO;2

Dorchin et al. (2009):

Dorchin et al. (2009b):
Dorchin, N., Scott, E. R., Clarkin, C. E., Luongo, M. P., Jordan, S. and Abrahamson, W. G. (2009) Behavioural, ecological and genetic evidence confirm the occurrence of host‐associated differentiation in goldenrod gall‐midges. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22: 729-739. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01696.x

Dorchin et al. (2015):
Dorchin, N., Joy, J. B., Hilke, L. K., Wise, M. J., Abrahamson, W. G. (2015) Taxonomy and phylogeny of the Asphondylia species (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) of North American goldenrods: challenging morphology, complex host associations,
and cryptic speciation. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 174: 265-304. doi:10.1111/zoj.12234

Elsayed et al. (2018):
Elsayed, A. K., Yukawa, J., Tokuda, M. (2018) A taxonomic revision and molecular phylogeny of the eastern Palearctic species of the genera Schizomyia Kieffer and Asteralobia Kovalev (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae, Asphondyliini), with descriptions of five new species of Schizomyia from Japan. Zookeys 808: 123-160.

Heard & Kitts (2012):

Ibrahim (1980):

Felt, E. P. (1915):

Felt, E. P. (1917):
Felt, E.P. Key to American Insect Galls. New York State Museum Bulletin 200.

Foote (1964):
Foote, R. H. (1964) A new synonym in the genus Eurosta (Diptera: Tephritidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 66 (1): 61.

Foote, R. H., Blanc, F. L., and Norrbom, A. L. (1993) Handbook of the Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of America North of Mexico

Goeden & Teerink (1997):

Goeden & Norrbom (2001) Life history and description of adults and immature stages of Procecidochares blanci, n. sp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Isocoma acradenia (E. Greene) E. Greene (Asteraceae) in Southern California. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 103 (3-4): 517-540.

Kellicott, D. S. (1878) A new gall moth and notes on larvae of other gall moths. The Canadian Entomologist 10(11): 202-204.

Miller (1963):

Ming (1989): Thesis, referenced in Foote et al. (1993)

Moffat et al. (2019):

Philips and Smith (1998):

Phillips (1923): https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25003994.pdf

Steyskal & Foote (1977):
Steyskal, G. C. and Foote, R. H. (1977) Revisionary notes on North American Tephritidae (Diptera), with keys and descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 79 (1): 146-155.

Stireman et al. (2010):

Stoltzfus (1974):

Stoltzfus (1989):

Sutton & Steck (2005):

Quisenberry (1951):
Quisenberry, B. F. (1951) A Study of the Genus Tephritis Latreille in the Nearctic Region North of Mexico (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Apr., 1951), pp. 56-72

All unattributed photos are my own.

Ingresado el 08 de octubre de 2019 por ddennism ddennism | 21 comentarios | Deja un comentario

11 de septiembre de 2018

Two Texas Toadshades

Trillium gracile, and T. ludovicianum may both be present in eastern Texas. These are my notes for distinguishing them from one another, taken from the monograph where John Freeman first described T. gracile and clarified the previously-hazy description of T. ludovicianum. Where metrics are given, I have omitted the extreme values, providing only the "typical" ranges (not in parentheses). Other Trillium also occur in Texas. By "leaves" I mean, technically, "bracts".

T. gracile T. ludovicianum
scape length : leaf length 3.2 - 3.5 2.4 - 2.8
shape elliptic
(elliptic-ovate to elliptic-oblong)
lanceolate or
broadly ovate
length 18 - 26 mm 24 - 40 mm
apex shape acuminate-blunt or obtuse acute or acute-rounded
length 21 - 35 mm 35 - 55 mm
anther sac
introrse latrorse
pollen color creamy - yellow olive - orange
anther connective
short-beaked short-rounded
carpel-height : stamen-length barely exceeding 0.5 ≥ 0.75
ovary x-section 3-angled 6-angled
stigma length 2.0 - 4.5 mm 4.5 - 10 mm
stigma attachment divergent
extending ovary outline into lyre-shape
initially continuous in outline with ovary
bending distal to point of attachment
outline smooth often prominently 6-ridged

I have seen comments suggesting that clump-formation and overall plant size differ between the two species, with T. ludovicianum being both more likely to form clumps and generally taller. These are not mentioned in Freeman's monograph. He gives an overlapping range of scape lengths for the two species, with T. gracile being actually taller on average (though it has petals that are about 2 cm shorter):

Trillium gracile: (16-) 20-32.5 (-36) cm long scapes
Trillium ludovicianum: (10-) 15-28 (-37) cm long scapes

Singlehurst et al. (2003) summarized the occurrences of Trillium in Texas. Changes from Freeman's monograph germane to their separation by morphology:

  1. T. gracile is listed as having elliptic to broadly ovate leaves.
  2. T. ludovicianum is listed as having clump-forming tendencies lacking in T. gracile

The two species are probably at least partially temporally isolated with T. gracile blooming later: late Mar -May vs. late Feb - early Apr.

Ingresado el 11 de septiembre de 2018 por ddennism ddennism | 0 comentarios | Deja un comentario

10 de agosto de 2018


U. grandiflora U. perfoliata U. sessilifolia U. puberula U. floridana
leaf attachment perfoliate perfoliate sessile sessile sessile
tepal planar curvature whole tepal twirls along long axis, apex may flare tepal margins may roll outwards, apex may flare apex may flare apex may flare tepal twirls distally along long axis, apex may flare
tepal abaxial surface smooth raised orange-yellow bumps smooth smooth smooth
stem cross-section at nodes terete terete angled angled, with rough puberulence along ridges angled
leaf abaxial surface pubescent glabrous-glaucous glabrous-glaucous puberulent(-glabrous) glabrous

U. floridana also has a leaf-like bract (very, very near the flower) that is absent in its close relatives (U. sessilifolia, U. puberula)

Ingresado el 10 de agosto de 2018 por ddennism ddennism | 1 comentario | Deja un comentario

26 de junio de 2018

Two Erigeron in PA

Erigeron annuus and Erigeron strigosus are the two Erigeron species in PA with tapering leaf bases (rather than clasping leaves).

Flora of PA treatment uses vague descriptors to distinguish them (what constitutes "numerous leaves"?) that might be useful once the user is already familiar with the two.

Flora of North America entry (Guy Nesom, 2004) quickly distinguishes them from other Erigeron based on lack of pappus on ray florets, but not disc florets . This is pictured in my observation.
It then emphasizes stem vestiture, which might not be visible in many observations on iNaturalist. Even this emphasis includes quite a bit of overlap, apparently to accommodate some varieties of E. strigosus and to accommodate the fact that E. annuus sometimes has strigose hairs too.

Michigan Flora gets around this problem by ignoring the problematic E. strigosus var. septentrionalis (associating it with some forms of E. annuus), which makes for a cleaner couplet, but who knows? it might be an oversimplification:

"E. annuus: Middle region of stem glabrate to pubescent with all or many of the hairs long (0.5–1.2 mm) and spreading; principal cauline leaves usually elliptic to ovate, ca. 10–35 (–40) mm wide, with a few large teeth.

E. strigosus: Middle region of stem moderately to densely pubescent with only short (0.5 mm or less) mostly appressed-antrorse hairs; principal cauline leaves linear to oblanceolate, ca. 2.5–10 (–15) mm wide, entire."


Ingresado el 26 de junio de 2018 por ddennism ddennism | 2 observaciones | 0 comentarios | Deja un comentario

28 de marzo de 2018

Two Blue Cohosh Species

Caulophyllum thalictroides and Caulophyllum giganteum are separate species according, as far as I can tell, mostly to this paper. However, it occurs to me, reading this paper, that physiological effects of early emergence could confound the determination of the morphological details used in this study.

For example, if the emergence and flowering phenology of C. giganteum is earlier, and if the vegetative characters that supposedly distinguish the species continue to expand and grow, as do many forest herbs, then the vegetative characters could appear larger for supposed C. giganteum plants just as a consequence of their head-start. This could be a problem as long as all the plants in this part of the study were sampled on the same day-of-the-year, rather than day-since-emergence (they were).

"On the collection date of the mass sample, 11 May 1982, C. giganteum had completed flowering while C. thalictroides was in anthesis." But how were such plants assigned species-identifications, then? Hopefully not by the same morphological characters that were used in the PCA!

The vegetative morphological characters in the single-population experiment:

Vegetative differences in C. giganteum (all longer and/or bigger):

  1. leaflet length and width of the first two leaves
  2. leaflet sinus length of the first two leaves
  3. primary petiolule length of the first two leaves
  4. terminal inflorescence length
  5. and a decrease in the degree of compounding of the second leaf.
The authors also show that flower size differences distinguish the species. (This part is from herbarium specimens across the ranges of all three species in the genus.)
  1. stamen length
  2. sepal length
  3. pistil length
  4. petal length
  5. ratio of filament length to anther length
    (but you shouldn't use ratios in this type of analysis)

In this case, they found convincing evidence of a bimodal distribution along PCA1 (composed of the above 5 characters, in decreasing order of importance, and with the same positive valence), which suggests two morphologically distinct species, one big-flowered and one small-flowered. However, this shows no evidence of the claimed phenological separation, and doesn't really show evidence of other traits that supposedly differentiate the species (flower number per inflorescence, perianth color). Herbarium specimens are not always the most representative examples of a given population, and there may well have been plants in the C. giganteum populations that had smaller flowers that were less conspicuous to the collectors.

A common greenhouse experiment might be necessary to determine whether there really is separation here, and I'd like to see evidence that organ expansion has completed by the time of its determination in the first part of this study. But maybe first I should observe some of these populations for myself:

The closest Caulophyllum locations to me:

For my late April trip to Shenandoah:

on the way down:

in and around Shenandoah:

Ingresado el 28 de marzo de 2018 por ddennism ddennism | 4 comentarios | Deja un comentario

16 de marzo de 2018

Three Similar Toadshades in SE USA

Trillium decipiens, T. reliquum , and T. underwoodii form a group of three closely related species. Here are my notes for distinguishing them from one another, taken from the monograph where the other two were first segregated from a broader concept of T. underwoodii.

T. decipiens T. underwoodii T. reliquum
stalk (scape)
erect erect decumbent*
stalk : leaf
length ratio
2.5 - 3.0
leaf tips don't touch ground
1.0 - 2.5
leaf tips often touch ground
1.6 - 2.0
leaf surfaces at or near ground level
carriage at flowering
divergent-spreading horizontal,
or curving back down to touch leaves
length : width ratio 3.0 - 3.5 3.5 - 4.0 3.5 - 4.0
broadly oblanceolate - obovate narrowly oblanceolate to narrowly elliptic usually narrowly elliptic,
but variable
length : width ratio 2 - 3 3.5 - 5 3.5 - 4
occasionally broader
color highly variable, from
green to yellow-purple to brown-purple
(rarely yellowish)
(rarely yellowish)
anther sac dehiscence lateral lateral introrse
stamen : carpel
height ratio
≈ 1.5 ≈ 1.5 ≥ 2
leaf shape lanceolate
(straight line from widest point to apex)
(straight line from widest point to apex)
broadly elliptic
(convex curve from widest point to apex)

*not nearly as decumbent as Trillium decumbens. In the T. reliquum population I visited, the stalk (scape) will sometimes only hint at 'laxness' with a slight 'S' bend, but at least some plants in a given population should have scapes that grow initially along the ground.

Ingresado el 16 de marzo de 2018 por ddennism ddennism | 2 observaciones | 0 comentarios | Deja un comentario

21 de febrero de 2018

Distinguishing Yellow Trout Lilies in E USA

It's easy to distinguish our three yellow trout lilies from one another when they are in-fruit, or dug-up. But what about when they're in-bloom? You know, when you notice them?

The presence of stolons can be inferred from the number of one-leaved, 'sterile' plants in a population. The stolon-producing species often produce carpets of plants in this stage; E. umbilicatum subsp. umbilicatum will only produce the occasional cluster of steriles, which are either same-aged siblings (clustered by a single fruit dispersal event) or offsets.

Clifford Parks and James Hardin (1963) carried out an exhaustive study of their floral characteristics and correlated them to stolon production, ploidy, and capsule shape. I thought the results of their paper might be useful to iNaturalists. They are summarized here:

E. rostratum E. americanum E. umbilicatum
subsp. umbilicatum
E. umbilicatum
subsp. monostolum
tepal carriage agape strongly reflexed strongly reflexed strongly reflexed
flower angle erect nodding nodding nodding
stolons 1+ 1+ 0 1
capsule shape
in profile
strongly beaked
rounded, truncate,
or apiculate
rarely merely truncate
capsule presentation held erect not erect
but still held off the ground
reclining on the ground reclining on the ground
or rarely just above
petal bases clearly auricled
encircling filaments
minutely auricled
or toothed
not auricled not auricled,
but margin irregular
green coloration
on abaxial side of tepals
none none or slight none present
pale spot
at base of inside of tepals
absent absent in 90%
otherwise vague or small
always present,
but sometimes small
always present
often prominent and large
dark flecking
on perianth
absent absent or slight absent or slight,
but variable
always present,
few to many
style thickness
just below point of
stigmatic divergence
thickened thickened remains thin remains thin
stigma lobes swollen
anther & pollen color yellow
or brown-lavender
rarely yellow
rarely yellow
ploidy diploid tetraploid diploid diploid

Not included: E. americanum subsp. harperi, because the authors questioned its distinctiveness. It's mainly distinguished from E. americanum subsp. americanum by having (1) more strongly-apiculate capsules and (2) stigma lobes that are 'distinctly grooved distally' and variously described as 'recurved' or merely 'divergent'. It is documented from Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, and southern Tennessee. Geraldine Allen and Kenneth Robertson consider it to be more reliably distinct and single it out in their treatment of the genus for The Flora of North America entry.

Ingresado el 21 de febrero de 2018 por ddennism ddennism | 4 comentarios | Deja un comentario