Unknown population of genus Moncheca?

All usage of images obey code of Creative Commons license. Owner and original link provided.
For long, one key feature to distinguish two very similar and overlap distributing Moncheca species M. elegans and M. pretiosa are the difference of light color stripe on the pronotum. M. elegans has one while M. pretiosa has two light color stripes.
Typical M. elegans observed by jaspersail

Typical M. pretiosa observed by pavelkirillov

But there are a special phenotype of Moncheca, which does not have obvious light color stripes on pronotum as normal M.elegans and M. pretiosa , and replace by dark color. Some of the individuals are IDed as M. pretiosa because the similarity and more obvious color stripes but most of them remain genus because this characteristic are unrecognizable or even absent.
Untypical Moncheca IDed as M. pretiosa, observed by birdernaturalist

Another untypical Moncheca observed by rbeunen

Coincidentally I found that all those individuals distribute in an area including middle and southern Peru and nothern Bolivia along Andes, and have geographical isolation with ordinary M. pretiosa. This could indicate that those individuals possibly represent a regional population. But what taxon could it be? A regional phenotype of M. pretiosa? A subspecies? Or even new species? Moncheca from that area need further research.
Thanks to all observers and your nice photos!
@jaspersail @pavelkirillov @birdernaturalist @rbeunen
Someone who may interested in this journal
@typophyllum @joshbern @lrubio7 @jimmylegs @cabrerai @zelun0903 @graytreefrog Please tag more people if you think they are interested or can help with it!

Publicado el abril 24, 2023 12:59 TARDE por manassas manassas

Comentarios

Interesting. I wonder what it means. I don't look at South America so I won't be the one to figure it out. Naskrecki's Katydids of Costa Rica includes the following under Moncheca: "Specimens from Peru mentioned by Hebard (1927) as having much darker coloration are also distinct from the two species known from Costa Rica, and possibly represent another undescribed species."
The citation to the Hebard paper is:
Hebard. 1927. Studies in the Tettigoniidae of Panama. Transactions of the American Entomological Society. 53: 79 - 156.

Publicado por jimmylegs hace 12 meses

Very useful information. But to validify it, key characteristics need to be checked.

Publicado por manassas hace 12 meses

Agregar un comentario

Acceder o Crear una cuenta para agregar comentarios.