Just going to add a side note. I probably wouldn't have lumped these back under variety. Silphiums are likely to be split out more rather than lumped back in, in future. I do understand that it follows POWO, and honestly there's not a satisfying Silphium treatment (Mason Brock's treatment in Flora of the Southeastern US is the best I've used and even he admits it's not perfect). For now this is probably the logical step, but I expect this may be undone in a few years.
Los desacuerdos no intencionados ocurren cuando un grupo padre (B) se adelgaza al cambiar un grupo hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico, provocando que las Identificaciones existentes del grupo padre sean interpretados como desacuerdos con las Identificaciones existentes del grupo hijo cambiado.
Identification
La ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no intencionado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del intercambio de ancestros
Si el adelgazamiento del grupo padre provoca más de 10 desacuerdos no intencionados, deberías dividir el grupo padre después de intercambiar el grupo hijo para substituir las identificaciones existentes del grupo padre (B) con identificaciones con las que no esté en desacuerdo,
Just going to add a side note. I probably wouldn't have lumped these back under variety. Silphiums are likely to be split out more rather than lumped back in, in future. I do understand that it follows POWO, and honestly there's not a satisfying Silphium treatment (Mason Brock's treatment in Flora of the Southeastern US is the best I've used and even he admits it's not perfect). For now this is probably the logical step, but I expect this may be undone in a few years.