Taxonomic Swap 16296 (Guardado el 15/08/2016)

Haworth originally described Sphinx quinquemaculata in 1803. Thus the species epithet quinquemaculata has priority. Unfortunately, Bugguide uses the incorrect quinquemaculatus for reason I do not understand. (MPG also mnakes the same mistake.) The brand new checklist of NA Leps by Greg Pohl, Bob Patterson & Jon Pelham uses the -ta epithet. I suggest we do not follow BG, and use the taxonomically correct epithet. Further I suggest that iNat use the Pohl et al checklist as the authority for names. This checklist has a lot more scientific authority than BG, IMHO.

Hugh

desconocido
Añadido por hughmcguinness el agosto 14, 2016 03:40 TARDE | Comprometido por hughmcguinness el 15 de agosto de 2016
Reemplazado con

Comentarios

@carrieseltzer How does this look?

Publicado por hughmcguinness hace más de 7 años

Looks ok to me! Thanks for looking into it and providing the explanation. That's the part I figured you were better equipped to do.

Publicado por carrieseltzer hace más de 7 años

Looks good to me. As far as I can tell (though I am not a student of Latin), the name Manduca is a Latin verb, so it does not have a gender, and therefore there is no reason to correct the feminine 'quadrimaculata' species name to a masculine form.

I agree with following the new checklist in cases like this, but I would hold off on applying it to all of iNat until it is finalized/published.

Publicado por pete_woods hace más de 7 años

Agregar un comentario

Acceder o Crear una cuenta para agregar comentarios.