|
dividido en |
|
@jpsilva I replaced the version of B. chacei I made here with the duplicate you made. In the future, I'd really appreciate it if you could a) check for pending taxon changes before adding taxa, and b) not add active new taxa when they represent a split of an existing taxon. If you'd like to help out with this split, you could add atlases for the two new concepts here so this split can appropriately divide observations of B. californica sensu stricto.
@kueda , thanks for the tip. Actually I created the taxon before I knew you were preparing this split.
Alrighty, the split has been committed. Those of you who are interested in these records should review https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/identify?reviewed=any&place_id=92151&taxon_id=49901 and add IDs using the new taxon concepts. Those of you who jumped ahead and added IDs of B. californica sensu lato as if it was B. californica sensu stricto will need to revisit those IDs b/c some of them probably got replaced with genus Berthella IDs in the overlap zone. I realize that's annoying, but this is why it's better to set up a taxon change with inactive output taxa instead of just making active outputs and starting to ID immediately. If you want to widen your scope to all pleurobranchs there are probably some more interesting mis-IDs like https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/7564676
The copyright does not allow us to post it on ResearchGate, but I have posted a private copy that I can share. You just need to send a request to me on RG. Thanks!