Atención: Algunas o todas las identificaciones afectadas por esta división puede haber sido reemplazada por identificaciones de Berthella. Esto ocurre cuando no podemos asignar automáticamente una identificación a uno de los taxa de salida. Revisar identificaciones de Berthella californica 49902

Taxonomic Split 76086 (Guardado el 20/05/2020)

B. californica sensu-a-few-days-ago has been split, and WoRMS accepts it: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1436161. The underlying paper is Ghanimi et al. (2020). Unfortunately, it is closed-access, but the authors have provided a copy that I've used to write up this split.

Relevant notes on distinguishing the two species from Ghanimi et al. (2020):

In addition to genetic differences, B. californica and B. chacei also exhibit consistent differences in size and in aspects of their external and internal morphology. Berthella chacei is typically smaller than B. californica. The largest specimen of B. californica examined anatomically in this study (34 mm long) was about 0.6 times as large as the largest specimen of B. chacei examined (20 mm long) and, as described in the Introduction, the two species are known to reach lengths of 127 mm and 70 mm, respectively. Berthella chacei has a white to creamy white mantle whereas B. californica has a creamy white to brown mantle. In B. chacei, the white dorsal spots on the mantle are on tubercles and the rest of the mantle is typically smooth, whereas in B. californica the white dorsal spots are not on the tubercles and the entire mantle is always smooth. The white dorsal spots on the mantle vary in size in B. chacei, but they are typically of uniform size in B. californica. White specks are present on the rhinophores, oral veil and the foot of B. chacei, whereas in B. californica typically no structure other than the mantle bears any white spots. Most specimens of B. californica possess a longitudinal white dorsal stripe on each rhinophore (Fig. 1A–C), a character not present in B. chacei (Fig. 1E–G). Finally, the egg mass of B. chacei (Fig. 1H) is white, wavy and relatively rigid, compared to the darker coloured, more delicate and less wavy egg mass of B. californica (Fig. 1C).

Here's a summary of what seem to be the differences that are relevant to making identifications on iNat (with help from Jeff Goddard):

Berthella californica Berthella chasei
Range Ventura County, CA, USA to the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador Sea of Japan to San Diego County, CA, USA
Morphology viisble in photos
  • Uniform dorsal spots
  • No spots on the oral veil or rhinophores
  • Rhinophores typically have a dorsal white stripe
  • Mixed-size dorsal spots
  • Oral veil and rhinophores usually spotted
  • Dorsal spots on tuburcles
Photos
Photo: Craig Hoover
Photo: Robin Agarwal
Photo: Craig Hoover
Photo: Damon Tighe
Añadido por kueda el mayo 17, 2020 09:23 TARDE | Comprometido por kueda el 20 de mayo de 2020
dividido en

Comentarios

The copyright does not allow us to post it on ResearchGate, but I have posted a private copy that I can share. You just need to send a request to me on RG. Thanks!

Publicado por tgosliner hace casi 4 años

@jpsilva I replaced the version of B. chacei I made here with the duplicate you made. In the future, I'd really appreciate it if you could a) check for pending taxon changes before adding taxa, and b) not add active new taxa when they represent a split of an existing taxon. If you'd like to help out with this split, you could add atlases for the two new concepts here so this split can appropriately divide observations of B. californica sensu stricto.

Publicado por kueda hace casi 4 años

@kueda , thanks for the tip. Actually I created the taxon before I knew you were preparing this split.

Publicado por jpsilva hace casi 4 años

Ok, I've atlased the output taxa and written up the differences between the two species, so as far as I'm concerned, this is ready to commit. I'll hold off on that for a bit in case anyone has any feedback.

Publicado por kueda hace casi 4 años

Alrighty, the split has been committed. Those of you who are interested in these records should review https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/identify?reviewed=any&place_id=92151&taxon_id=49901 and add IDs using the new taxon concepts. Those of you who jumped ahead and added IDs of B. californica sensu lato as if it was B. californica sensu stricto will need to revisit those IDs b/c some of them probably got replaced with genus Berthella IDs in the overlap zone. I realize that's annoying, but this is why it's better to set up a taxon change with inactive output taxa instead of just making active outputs and starting to ID immediately. If you want to widen your scope to all pleurobranchs there are probably some more interesting mis-IDs like https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/7564676

Publicado por kueda hace casi 4 años

Agregar un comentario

Acceder o Crear una cuenta para agregar comentarios.