15 de marzo de 2024

Keys to Aquatic Heteroptera of Western Canada

I have attempted to assemble as a reference some keys to Notonectidae and Corixidae of Western Canada. Although I believe these keys to be accurate, they have not been thoroughly tested, and I do not consider myself an expert in this group. Nevertheless, I hope they may be useful, at least as a starting point.

Notonectidae

1a. Relatively small; where the hemelytra meet, at the anterior end there is a hair-lined pit (commissure) 2
 2a. Pronotum distinctly broader than head at its widest point; [known from nearby WA, ID] Buenoa margaritacea
 2b. Pronotum no wider than head 3
  3a. Narrowest dorsal distance between eyes (synthlipsis) much narrower than anterior vertex width; [AB, BC, SK] B. confusa
  3b. Synthlipsis at least half the anterior vertex width; [BC, SK] B. macrotibialis
1b. Relatively large; no commissure where the hemelytra meet 4
 4a. Keel of fourth abdominal sternite bare, with hairs restricted to sides 5
  5a. Hemelytra mostly made of substantial dark/black and orange patches; [BC, AB, SK, YK, NT] Notonecta kirbyi
  5b. Hemelytra mostly white; generally stubbier than other pale Notonecta species in Western Canada; [BC, AB, SK, NT] N. borealis
 4b. Keel of fourth sternite not bare 6
  6a. Hemelytra darkly coloured, and generally with orange reticulation; [SK] N. irrorata
  6b. Hemelytra usually predominantly pale 7
   7a. Mesotrochanter nearly rounded; hemelytra typically white with one transverse black band; [BC, AB, SK, NT] N. undulata
   7b. Mesotrochanter angular or tooth-like 8
    8a. Mesotrochanter extended into a spine; synthlipsis less than half anterior vertex width; [BC, AB] N. spinosa
    8b. Mesotrochanter not spine-like; synthlipsis at least half anterior vertex width; [BC] N. unifasciata


From Hungerford, 1933; Menke, 1979.

Corixidae Genera

Identification of Corixidae is generally difficult or impossible without physical male specimens for close examination. Males are recognized because the segments of their abdomen are asymmetrical. Certain features, especially the shape of the dorsal surface of the abdomen beneath the wing covers (including the strigil) as well as the pala (fore tarsus) are highly important for identification.

1a. Body shape distinctive, unlike any other species in area; male without strigil (Cymatinae) Cymatia americana
1b. Body shape typical; strigil present or absent (Corixinae) 2
 2a. Eyes bulging (Glaenocorisini) 3
  3a. Male pala significantly dorsally expanded at base; northern, mostly known from the territories Glaenocorisa
  3b. Male pala not dorsally expanded at base Dasycorixa
 2b. Eyes normal (Corixini) 4
  4a. Male lacking strigil, or male with strigil on left 5
   5a. Male lacking strigil Callicorixa
   5b. Male with strigil on left Trichocorixa
  4b. Male with strigil on right 6
   6a. Rear margin of head sharply curved; interocular space much shorter than the width of an eye Palmacorixa
   6b. Not as above 7
    7a. Generally large species; prothoracic lobe about as long as wide Hesperocorixa
    7b. Prothoracic lobe distinctly elongate 8
     8a. Pronotum and clavus mostly smooth and shiny Corisella
     8b. Pronotum and clavus distinctly rough, either rastrate, rugose, or both 9
      9a. Clavus predominantly with broad, distinct transverse bands; pronotal carina absent or at most faintly expressed at anterior margin Sigara
      9b. Clavus reticulate, or rarely with irregular transverse bands broken and merging; at least anterior 1/3 of pronotum with medial carina 10
       10a. Median pronotal carina well-defined; male pala elongate Arctocorisa
       10b. Median pronotal carina usually only visible on anterior third; male pala broad Cenocorixa

References

Checklist of Hemiptera of Canada and Alaska. Maw et al., 2000.
A revision of the genus Buenoa (Notonectidae, Hemiptera). Truxal, 1952.
The genus Notonecta of the world (Notonectidae-Hemiptera). Hungerford, 1933.
Aquatic Heteroptera (Notonectidae and Macroveliidae) new to Washington and Idaho. Jack, 1990.
The semiaquatic and aquatic Hemiptera of California. Menke, 1979.

The Corixidae of Oregon and Washington (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Stonedahl & Lattin, 1986.
The Corixidae of the Western Hemisphere (Hemiptera). Hungerford, 1948.
New Provincial and State Records for Heteroptera (Hemiptera) in Canada and the United States. Scudder, 2008.
New Waterboatman Records for Western Canada (Hemiptera: Corixidae). Kenner & Needham, 2004.
New Waterboatman Records from Alberta, Canada (Hemiptera: Corixidae). Lapierre et al., 2020.
Nine Heteroptera (Hemiptera) new to Canada, with Additional New Provincial Records for Three Other Species in Canada. Scudder, 2009.

Publicado el marzo 15, 2024 09:50 TARDE por shawnb2 shawnb2 | 0 comentarios | Deja un comentario

29 de diciembre de 2023

Freshwater Crustaceans

This is just a quick overview of the extreme basics of collecting freshwater crustaceans. I do not consider myself an expert, and will likely update this as I learn more. For now I just want to gather some information in one place.

Basics

Western Canada's freshwater crustaceans include the following groups: Podocopida (freshwater ostracods), Copepoda (copepods), Cladocera (water fleas), Anostraca (fairy shrimp, ~20 sp.), Notostraca (tadpole shrimp, ~5 sp.), Laevicaudata/Spinicaudata (clam shrimp, 3 sp.), Amphipoda (amphipods, ~10 sp.), Asellidae (freshwater isopods, ~3 sp.), Bathynellacea (bathynellans, ? sp.), Mysida (opossum shrimp, 2 sp.), and Astacoidea (crayfish, 2-4 sp.).

Hand collection of most specimens can be done by scooping them directly into a watertight vial (be sure to label, and take note of habitat), or carefully pipetting them into a vial of water using an eyedropper (the standard 3mL disposable kind found at drugstores works well). Fragile specimens may be damaged by pipetting. Fully grown adults are usually required for identification (but sometimes smaller individuals at a site may be a different species), and often one sex (usually male) is required.

Planktonic groups of crustaceans can easily be collected via nets. Benthic groups such as many ostracods and harpacticoid copepods require other techniques, for example collecting sediment that can then be washed through a sieve.

Many species can be kept in refrigerated water for up to a week; however, to preserve them they should be transferred to ethanol while still alive. 95% ethanol is ideal for DNA work, but makes specimens brittle and difficult to dissect during identification. For this purpose, 70% should be used instead. Alcohol from freshly collected specimens should be discarded and replaced after about 24 hours; this ensures that the tissues reach a sufficient (non-diluted) concentration. Unfortunately, ethanol typically requires a work permit to obtain; isopropanol isn't as good, but can be used as an alternative and is obtainable at most drugstores.

Once specimens are obtained, most must be identified under the microscope, often requiring dissection. Ideally, one should have access to both high-quality dissecting and compound microscopes. Specimens can be deposited on a depression slide. Measurements are often useful and should be taken. Then, while keeping the specimen submerged in alcohol (or ideally glycerin), entomological pins held in a pin vice (or an alternative setup) may be used to coax appendages into view (at the risk of damaging the specimen). Back and top lighting can both be useful for viewing structures.

Ostracods

Ostracod preservation is a special case; for dissection, ideally they should first be killed in 30% alcohol. This relaxes their shells, making them easier to open. Moreover, due to having calcified shells which dissolve over time in alcohol, long-term voucher specimens are usually dried. Many species can be recognized by the shape of their shell; however, for confident identification a shell usually needs to be dissected to observe the appendages hidden inside.

Copepods

There are three groups of freshwater copepods in our area: Calanoida (antennae long, typically reaching body length, body narrows substantially at about halfway), Cyclopoida (antennae short, body narrows), Harpacticoida (antennae very short, body remains about the same width, mostly benthic).

For most copepods, the antennae and dorsal views of abdominal shape, caudal filaments (at the abdomen tip), and caudal rami (the structures to which the filaments are attached) are useful for identification to genus. For reliable identification of calanoid copepods, most require dissection of the 5th leg from an adult male. Males can be recognized by their elbowed right antennae. For cyclopoid copepods, females (having both antennae unbent) are more helpful, and the 4th leg also becomes useful. The freshwater Harpacticoids are poorly studied and only a few species in Canthocamptidae are recorded; in addition, the marine Tigriopus californicus (Harpacticidae) is often found in abundance in splash pools just above the intertidal.

Resources

Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates, 2e. Thorp & Covich, 2001.
Diversity and distributions of circumpolar fresh- and brackish-water Mysis. Audzijonyte & Väinölä, 2005.

Ostracods

Soft body morphology, dissection and slide-preparation of Ostracoda: a primer. Namiotko et al., 2011.
Field key and methods of collecting freshwater ostracodes in Canada. Delorme, 1967.

Copepods

An introduction and key to the freshwater Calanoid copepods (Crustacea) of British Columbia. Sandercock & Scudder, 1994.
Species identification of the fresh-water Cyclopoid Copepoda of the United States. Pennak, 1963.
An annotated checklist and keys to the species of Copepoda Harpacticoida (Crustacea). Wells, 2007.

Fairy Shrimp

Key to the Anostraca (Fairy Shrimps) of North America. Belk, 1975.
Key to the Anostraca of British Columbia. Grant, n.d.

Publicado el diciembre 29, 2023 08:04 TARDE por shawnb2 shawnb2 | 1 comentario | Deja un comentario

Archivos