Taxonomic Merge 129023
(Guardado el 05/08/2023)
|
|
combinado en |
|
Comentarios
Link to the "Afrotropical Butterfly Database" please. This is per Mark Williams (up to date), which has been the source in use for years.
Taxonomic changes on iNaturalist aren't based on specific papers, but rather the adoption of the changes proposed in papers by recognized databases or frameworks (such as Williams Encyclopaedia).
https://metamorphosis.org.za/?p=articles&s=Results&pt=419
This is the specific pdf. But you could have found it very easily, if you had cared to.
I did: but in it both subspecies are recognized: you should have figured that out!
see page 52&53
Please double check and unless you have a more recent publication, then reinstate these subspecies please.
@tonyrebelo Well, I'm an ass. Sincerely Tony, my apologies. The copy of the document I've been using is 2 weeks older than the new updated pdf, and I had not realized Williams (following Bernaud) had once again reversed positions on ssp. rosa. I'll reinstate and be more careful next time.
... and atlasing didn't work out as I intended.
The following 18 observations have been negatively impacted by my mucking about. Fortunately, most of the IDers are fairly active, so I expect it'll all be rectified shortly:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/749220
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/1121179
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/27063740
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/49807873
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/65714132
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/67494510
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/80901808
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/93696297
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/95673308
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104302326
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/107387394
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/120218570
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/121979834
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/139447389
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/140336036
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/157728039
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/163025437
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/172945863
Is this the right split? Are these not https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/128721 ?
Just one: must have crept in by error.
The Afrotropical Butterfly database recognizes these as separate taxa -
This citation is inadequate and does not link to the relevant paper. Please provide it.
@stevewoodhall @rjq